Wells Fargo set to be free of AML consent order


Wells Fargo is on the verge of being free of a 2015 enforcement motion tied to violations of its controls for combating cash laundering.

The Workplace of the Comptroller of the Foreign money not too long ago knowledgeable Wells that it’s been discovered to have glad the necessities of the five-year-old consent order, in line with two sources near the state of affairs. Notifying the financial institution is a procedural step that precedes the formal termination of a regulatory order.

The financial institution’s launch from the order would mark progress in CEO Charlie Scharf’s efforts to resolve its sprawling regulatory issues.

Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf, seen here testifying before Congress in March, has said that resolving the bank's regulatory problems is his top priority.

Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf, seen right here testifying earlier than Congress in March, has mentioned that resolving the financial institution’s regulatory issues is his prime precedence.


Nonetheless, the 2015 consent order is an illustration of how among the San Francisco financial institution’s regulatory issues have spawned extra such hassle. Wells Fargo mentioned in a securities submitting final month that it was persevering with to answer inquiries from varied federal businesses in reference to one other matter that grew out of its efforts to adjust to the anti-money-laundering order.

Spokespeople for the OCC and Wells Fargo declined to remark.

Scharf, who took over as Wells Fargo’s CEO in October 2019, has mentioned that assembly regulatory necessities is the agency’s prime precedence. The 2015 enforcement motion is considered one of 11 public consent orders underneath which the $1.9 trillion-asset financial institution has been working. That quantity had been 12, however a 2015 consent order with the Shopper Monetary Safety Bureau over alleged kickbacks within the mortgage enterprise expired earlier this yr.

Referring to the financial institution’s regulatory woes, Scharf mentioned earlier this month at an investor convention, “I feel it took some time for folks to actually digest what all of it meant for the corporate, fairly frankly.”

Wells Fargo nonetheless faces an extended highway forward. Bloomberg reported in early December that some prime firm executives count on an asset cap imposed by the Federal Reserve in 2018 to stay in place till not less than late 2021, whereas key Fed officers foresee a fair longer timeline.

The 2015 consent order was a response to issues that regulators present in Wells Fargo’s wholesale banking unit, which dealt with company prospects with annual gross sales in extra of $5 million. The OCC decided that the financial institution’s processes for figuring out whether or not particular person prospects posed a cash laundering threat have been ineffective. The order required Wells to gather sure details about the true homeowners of Wells Fargo’s company prospects, in accordance with regulatory steering on the helpful possession of firms.

However after Wells began doing the labor-intensive work wanted to fulfill its regulators, new issues arose. In 2018, Wells Fargo disclosed publicly that unnamed federal businesses had opened inquiries into potential misconduct in reference to the financial institution’s efforts to gather the helpful possession info. The issues have been first recognized by a caller to the corporate’s ethics line, in line with 2019 congressional testimony by then-CEO Tim Sloan.

The Wall Avenue Journal has reported that Wells Fargo workers improperly added or altered details about prospects, together with their Social Safety numbers, dates of beginning and residential addresses. Paperwork have been fabricated, and lots of of workers have been fired, one supply aware of the state of affairs instructed American Banker not too long ago.

Wells Fargo’s most up-to-date quarterly securities submitting exhibits that the regulatory inquiries associated to the gathering of helpful possession info have been nonetheless ongoing in November.

“When regulators discover one thing vital that went flawed within the compliance area, they usually will begin to pay extra consideration to the compliance program as a complete, and in so doing, uncover plenty of different deficiencies which may have in any other case gone unnoticed,” mentioned Ross Delston, an impartial Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who makes a speciality of anti-money-laundering compliance issues.

The AML consent order preceded the eruption of the Wells Fargo’s fake-accounts scandal in 2016, which led to each extra regulatory issues and a number of shake-ups within the financial institution’s management ranks.

Underscoring how a lot turnover the financial institution has seen in recent times, not one of the seven board members who signed the 2015 consent order, together with former Chairman and CEO John Stumpf, are nonetheless with the corporate.

Perry Pelos, who headed wholesale banking on the time the consent order was put in place, has described the following compliance work as each costly and time-intensive. Pelos turned CEO of business banking at Wells Fargo earlier this yr as a part of a reorganization.

“It isn’t that we do not know who our prospects are. It is that we’re not excellent at documenting it. We’re not excellent at aggregating issues,” Pelos mentioned in 2018, in line with a transcript of his remarks on the firm’s investor day that yr.

Another huge banks have taken even longer than Wells Fargo to resolve consent orders involving anti-money-laundering guidelines. A JPMorgan Chase order with the Fed from January 2013 remained in place for nearly seven years.

In Citigroup’s case, the Fed mentioned in an October 2020 enforcement motion that the New York financial institution had not adequately addressed AML deficiencies that have been recognized in a 2013 consent order.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here