Alipay and WeChat Pay logos for on-line fee are displayed at a retailer on November 9, 2019 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province of China. Ant Group which runs Alipay and Tencent which runs WeChat Pay, are the 2 dominant gamers in China’s cell funds house. However each firms provide different monetary companies. Regulators are holding a better eye on the fintech business in China.
Wang Qiming | Visible China Group | Getty Photographs
GUANGZHOU, China — China’s high banking regulator on Tuesday questioned the ability of the nation’s massive monetary know-how firms and hinted at “well timed and focused measures to forestall new systemic dangers.”
The transfer seems to be a nod towards extra laws in China’s burgeoning fintech sector.
Over the previous few months, Chinese language regulators have been rising more and more involved in regards to the dimension of its know-how giants and have proposed draft guidelines to control areas together with information use and antitrust.
Like in the U.S., China’s technology firms have been largely able to grow unencumbered and have turn into a function of day by day life in China — significantly in areas like cell funds and communications.
On Tuesday, Guo Shuqing, chairman of the China Banking and Insurance coverage Regulatory Fee (CBIRC), laid out areas that the authorities will probably be carefully within the fintech business throughout a speech on the Singapore Fintech Pageant.
“Dealing with the speedy development of fintech, we’ll undertake a optimistic and prudent method. We are going to encourage innovation whereas enhancing danger management, in order to deal with to new issues and challenges,” Guo mentioned.
Cybersecurity is one space of concern for the regulator. He spent plenty of time questioning the ability of massive fintech giants in China, however didn’t point out any by identify.
Guo mentioned “selling truthful market competitors” is a precedence however conventional anti-monopoly legal guidelines may not work for the fintech business.
“(The) fintech business results in many new phenomenon and issues. We’d have to pay extra consideration to the next questions. Have the massive tech blocked newcomers? Have they collected information improperly? Have they refused to reveal info that must be made public? Have they engaged in conduct deceptive customers and shoppers?”
Final month, one other regulator, the State Administration for Market Regulation, released draft rules that defined for the first time, what constitutes anti-competitive behavior. It’s seen as broadly aimed on the nation’s know-how giants like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, Meituan and others.
In the case of cell funds, Alibaba affiliate Ant Group and Tencent are the 2 dominant gamers through their respective apps Alipay and WeChat. However in addition they function different monetary companies akin to linking debtors to lenders. With out naming these corporations, Guo appeared to take goal at each these firms that do extra than simply funds.
“Some huge tech function cross-sector enterprise with monetary and know-how actions underneath one roof. It’s essential to carefully comply with this spillover … and take well timed and focused measures to forestall new systemic dangers,” he mentioned.
Guo additionally mentioned there’s a want for “clarifying information possession,” claiming massive know-how corporations have “de-facto management over information.” He mentioned it’s “essential to make clear information rights of various events.”
Earlier this yr, China’s legislature handed a Civil Code, which focuses on information safety for particular person customers. It’s set to return into impact subsequent yr.
Guo additionally mentioned there needs to be a concentrate on strengthening worldwide co-ordination for cross-border information stream.
In September, China launched a world information safety initiative outlining rules that must be adopted in areas from private info to espionage.